Development Team Augmentation for Gambling Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
We’re a gambling organisation with locations all over Europe. I’m based in our Estonia location where we educe software in-house.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Leobit?
It’s hard to find talented nation locally. Since it’s a competitive market, we’ve tried outsourcing some of the educement work. Our team is edifice a intricate betting platform, with its own CMS.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
The team at Leobit focused on integrations within the backend. They’ve worked on our inner CMS and back-office method. The main application is Ruby on Rails, with Vue.js on the frontend, and GraphQL for some sockets. The platform is on AWS.
People will come and go, but the onboarding involves sitting down with the new individual and effective them almost the project. Leobit’s team knows us as a client, in provisions of what we’re looking for and how we work. Because we have a little team, all the onboarding is done on their side.
We don’t necessarily prepare them with a lot of documentation. As far as I know, our approach is to give them approach to the code and let them remark it themselves. We try to make the code itself understandable, which was one of the reasons we went for Ruby on Rails.
It’s more of a dynamic, continuous share of information through dicsussions. If there’s a specific integration, there will be documentation implicated, but that’s principally for outer partners.
Was there a dedicated team?
At the instant, we’re working with six of their educeers. I had a project director in the commencement, but our CTO and fruit proprietor are principally working with them straightly. While we had dicsussions to see who would fit, Leobit was principally implicated in the hiring process.
How did you come to work with Leobit?
We got in touch with their team through Upwork. Our team establish a big aspirant and began working with them, and it turned out that there was a organisation behind them. Because we had a good relationship, we determined to layer up with Leobit. They were reliable and knew how we worked.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We’ve invested €250,000 (approachly 273,000 USD) so far.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
Our engagement with Leobit began in September 2018.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
We esteem their team’s engagement. The team at Leobit cares almost their work. When we’ve had searching issues or things that needed to go live, sometimes they worked on the weekends. Based on my experience, their powerful team cares almost organisation values.
I’m not a technical expert, but all they’re working on is accomplishing well. They’re delivering senior-level work. Some of their team members have Master degrees in computer studies.
In provisions of KPIs, it’s very intuitive at this stage. We’re a little team, and we’re measuring how well we’re working unitedly. A lot of this is done by CTO as well, but not through clear data points.
How did Leobit accomplish from a project handlement standpoint?
Their interaction is top-notch. Whenever we send an email, they answer fastly. Their complete team is kind and helpful. They’re respectful and try not to push us, which is another plus. It’s grateful to work with Leobit.
We determined to increase the engagement behind a huge milestone. We esteemd the effort that their team put in. Our team asked their handlement to buy a cake for them at our price. I reflection they wouldn’t direct us, but they did. Our interaction was principally through Skype and email.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?
They’re interpolitically-oriented. It’s good that an interpolitical organisation should adduce present, Western business practices. What stands Leobit out, in particular, is their educeers. I find their way of attractive themselves with the project to be a big front of the organisation, compared to others we’ve dealt with.
What fronts of their work would you like to get betterd?
The cake incident is the only little thing I can comment almost, but there weren’t any huge issues. That’s the only thing that stands out.
Do you have any advice for forthcoming clients of theirs?
Clients should be open and expound their needs. I wouldn’t handle Leobit differently than any other structure. They’ve helped us proactively, thinking almost ways to better the delivery of resources. I have nothing denying to say almost their team. The same standards and expectations should be applied to Leobit as with the client’s inner team.
