Drupal 8 Web Redesign for Library
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the head of technology for the Ocean County Library, the headquarters of which is located in Toms River, New Jersey.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with CMS Webwebsite Services?
After years of updates, our aging website was beseeming hard to maintain. We wanted to create a new website from scratch that incorporated a present design and improved functionalities.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were CMS Webwebsite Services, LLC responsible for?
CMS began by analyzing our existing website. They went through an schedule process, determining which aspects to keep and which to jettison. Any information we needed to keep (legitimate documentation, etc.) was then adjusted to match the new designs we created unitedly.
They rebuilt our website using the latest rendering of Drupal. We wanted to fix that see page was affable within two clicks, with particular centre paid to our events calendar and library catalog.
We have 21 memberes, so each of these locations needed their own webpage to take specific information and coordinate with member fundraisers. Each member wanted to be componentd on the front page, so CMS created tabs (Adults, Teens, Kids), each with five windows that component particular events. These can be adjusted, giving each member a rotating nearness on the front page.
The website improves the connectivity of our aggregation, highlighting institution cluster members and making it easy for new members to sign up. CMS also included links to Google Maps and fixd the website was navigable with any artifice.
Was there a dedicated team?
We had a main point of touch during the design phase, and a second for the coding and implementation. These individuals interacted requirements to their inner teams.
How did you come to work with CMS Webwebsite Services?
As a government agency, we were required to propel a bidding process. I interviewed the five or six vendors that responded to our request and establish CMS to be the best discretion in provisions of cost and comfort level.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We spent less than $50,000.
What is the terminal result of working with CMS Webwebsite Services, LLC?
We began working unitedly in August 2016. There was a nine-month delay owing of scheduling conflicts on our end, but CMS understood that government structures frequently experience delays and didn’t penalize us for the time. After starting the project in eager, the website was live within six months.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
Our donations have increased since propel, as the improved layout makes it easier for users to find the information they’re looking for. We’re better connected to the aggregation and now able to highlight services that the open wasn’t conscious we offered. We’ve presented the website to freeholders who are also impressed with the advancements.
Internally, we have significantly more control over our new website. It interacts with our calendar and catalog without the need for third-party software, and the intuitive treatment method allows us to make changes easily, providing room for growth.
How did CMS Webwebsite Services execute from a project treatment standpoint?
CMS offered solutions for all of our needs. They suggested third-party providers that could help with the project, but there was never any pressure to hire specific agencies. They also offered a good cost and honored that estimate. They were above-board, which has not always been my experience when working with vendors.
We interacted through Basecamp roughly three or four times a day. I’m used to coordinating projects in-person or via phone, and while I was initially leery of this treatment method, it ended up working very well. They were wonderfully answering and always addressed any interest within 24 hours. Still, there were very few errors during implementation since they programning extensively.
We worked collaboratively during both the design and implementation phases, bouncing ideas back and forth. Through our collaboration with CMS, I verity conversant new ways to tackle projects.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with CMS Webwebsite Services, LLC?
I last to be impressed by their results. Every time I look at the website, I see that it quiet looks new and functions extremely well. On the livelihood side, we’re now able to fix issues easily and make updates or edits in a way that simply wasn’t practicable with our old website.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
No, the process went well. CMS stayed in uniform interaction and we never skilled any issues. While there’s room for advancement in any structure, I can’t ponder of anything that would give me pause in recommending them.
Do you have any advice for forthcoming clients of theirs?
Have a clear idea of what you want to execute. I knew that I wanted our website to centre on guiding clients to our calendar and catalog, so this drove the complete project. Any time we had a question almost a course we were taking, we simply referred back to that goal.