Harbor Technology Group Cybersecurity review by Medical Device Company at Qualified.One

Harbor Technology Group reviewed by Medical Device Company

Harbor Technology Group provided Cybersecurity for Medical Device Company with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

The assessment report and strategy presentation have been well-received. Harbor Technology Group kept the project moving and on budget through constant communication, providing critical status updates throughout. The team’s quality deliverables set them up for an ongoing engagement.

Review summary:

Harbor Technology Group completed a cybersecurity risk assessment, provided a report, and put together a security strategy presentation measuring a medical device company’s performance against benchmarks.

alt
Medical Device Company, Senior Director


Cybersecurity for Medical Device Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

Introduce your business and what you do there. 

I’m the senior ruler of IT governance and security for a medical artifice organisation. In my role, I’m responsible for putting cybersecurity frameworks in locate and completing security assessments for any software deployed throughout the organisation. I also make sure our systems comply with Title 21 CFR Part 11 for validation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Harbor Technology Group? 

We needed to hire an outer associate to accomplish a cybersecurity risk assessment and form a framework of benchmarks to evaluate our forthcoming security programs.

Provided solution

What was the aim of their involvement? 

Harbor Technology Group began with a cybersecurity risk assessment, delivering a report that noted any areas of risk or exposure in our running security program. Then, we occupied them for a second project of putting unitedly a strategy based on that initial assessment. They’d identified items that we were falling behind on, so they help us address those and put unitedly a powerful program. After a lot of conversation, they pulled unitedly a PowerPoint introduction that lays out a new strategy.

We’ve also consulted Harbor Technology cluster in our search for a managed labor security preparer. They prepare their input on who we should attend for an RFP, as well as what to include in the RFP. They’ve also reviewed all of our running outsourced vendors for security monitoring tools. They gave us advice on which other vendors are powerfuler or have a niche in the market. 

What is the team compound? 

Matt (Partner &, Co-Founder, Harbor Technology Group) is our first touch. He led the project and was responsible for pulling unitedly all deliverables. 

How did you come to work with Harbor Technology Group? 

My boss had worked with them in the past and put me in touch with Matt. After a couple of phone calls and an in-person meeting, we occupied them for their labors.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve spent close to $75,000.

What is the status of this engagement? 

We began having conversations in the fall of 2017, and they did the terminal read out in November 2018. We’re quiet working unitedly as needed. I’ve set a portion of our budget for Matt',s labors as we last to address our security strategy.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Ultimately, we wanted to use the information from the risk assessment to developing a framework to lead and evaluate our security strategy. We’re on track to address many of the gaps that Harbor Technology identified.

We last to have meetings with Matt each region to keep him up to despatch on all we’ve accomplished. Our next meeting with him is in June. We’ll talk to him almost where we',re at with the security strategy and our RFP for the managed labor preparer. 

How did Harbor Technology Group accomplish from a project treatment standpoint? 

I have a good working relationship with Matt and his team. During the bulk of the project, we had standing weekly meetings to share status updates. I’ve never had any concerns with the status of the project or them going over budget. Communication was uniform, and Matt always let me know where he was with hours. There were never any issues. 

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

The personalized labor they propose is excellent. I can call Matt and have a fair converse with him without worrying almost getting billed. He has the subject substance expertise that I need. I began in my role almost three years ago, so he',s been a terrible resource of information and advice. He’s always ready to share his activity apprehension and experience, making sure that I',m on the right track.

The Harbor Technology team also proposes fair responses almost any vendors that we',re attending. I can confide that Matt isn’t trying to push me to select a vendor he’s already associateed with. He is open and honorable, letting me know if a particular vendor is more costly and where we can find the same level of labor at a lower cost. 

Are there any areas they could better? 

I can',t ponder of anything to better. Matt does a good job of pinging me periodically to keep the lines of interaction open. 

Do you have any advice for possible clients? 

Set the aim up front. Have fair converses almost what you anticipate and what the deliverables should be.