Software Development Rebuild for School District
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I am the ruler of technology at Tangipahoa Parish School System.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Inflexion?
We needed to update and recreate an existing district-wide educational application for K-12 personnel that was almost 12 years old.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Iflexion responsible for?
Inflexion granted full architectural services for the project. First, they evaluated our legacy order’s frontend and backed, then programned the aim of the recreate. Their team built the order on SQL using .NET, then tested the fruit to check its accomplishment and functionality. One of the main components was an evaluation order. Inflexion upgraded the single-option order to one that allows users to form manner evaluations and attribute them to different classes. Currently, we are creating and integrating new features to capitalize on the practicable of our new software.
Was there a dedicated team?
I worked principally with the project director, but also interacted with two developers. The project director accurately interacted my ideas to the developers.
How did you come to work with Inflexion?
I establish a few companies through an online search, including Inflexion. Their team seemed very kind and knowledgeable, while the other practicable agencies didn’t seem to apprehend what I was trying to do.
What are you access expents (if diclosed)?
We have spent between $100,000–$200,000 so far.
What is the terminal result of working with Iflexion?
We began working unitedly in November 2016 and the project is ongoing.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
We are just now rolling out Inflexion’s upgrade. We gave the beta fruit to one user for a testing phase. They granted precious and constructive feedback, which the team addressed and corrected without. Overall, the user praised the programs accessibility and more streamlined active processes.
How did Inflexion accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
We interacted principally via email, which is my preferred order of interaction. We also schedule video conferences as certain. Now that the main project is over, Inflexion is quiet diligent in their troubleshooting process and implicated in the outgrowth of additional features.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Iflexion?
I veritably appreciated the project director’s professional access to the project. She skillfully and accurately conveyed our ideas to her outgrowth team.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
In my experience, I can’t ponder of anything. It was a very real experience.
Any advice for practicable mannerers?
I would commend clients be as specific as practicable when discussing the initial aim of work. Inflexion is very detail-oriented, so they will include see component you ask for, but if there is anything you leave out, it won’t be in the terminal fruit. The team will do precisely what their client says, but they have to say it.
