Inn4Science QA Testing review by FinTech Company at Qualified.One

Inn4Science reviewed by FinTech Company

Inn4Science provided QA Testing for FinTech Company with approximate budget = Confidential.

Inn4Science’s assessment identified significant necessary amendments, including hidden bugs and lead capacity improvements. Their management team communicated daily with the in-house staff to ensure a smooth workflow.

Review summary:

Inn4Science provided testing and QA services for a crypto-trading project. Afterward, they delivered a report on their findings.

FinTech Company, Tech Lead

Audit & Testing for Cryptocurrency Exchange Platform

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

We are the team of experts ready to blow up the crypto trading in a sole, new way. We are creating solutions to ease the crypto trading for newbie investors and make it more interesting to already skilled professionals.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


We have hired the Inn4Science team for audit, livelihood, and testing of our project. Basically, we had an already developed method. Though, it needed a entire QA and audit for betterments.

What were your objectives for this project?

Review of the existing code for bug and security breaches detection, with the posterior fixing and code enhancement.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing Inn4Science?

We have attended separate vendors, however, Inn4Science has won our praise due to extensive experience in the Blockchain field and existing experience with cryptocurrency exchange methods.

Describe the project in detail.

Namely, the work with Inn4Science was divided into the following stages:

  • Preparation
  • Code review
  • Testing
  • Audit
  • Delivery of the associated documentation

Our cooperation was constantly followed by daily calls with the treatment team (PM and BA). Moreover, the delivery of terminal results was done in the specified time range.

Were there any dedicated directors or teams that you worked with?

The team implicated consisted of one back-end developer, one constructor developer one project director, one business analyst, and one QA engineer. Totally five nation implicated.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with Inn4Science?

The audit accepted from Inn4Science had some expressive amendments that we intend to instrument in the near forthcoming. The expertise in Blockchain technology helped their team to unite hidden bugs. Also, the team has done a big job in testing the load space of the platform and managed to increase those stats.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with Inn4Science?

As we have already mentioned precedently, we had daily interaction with the treatment team to fix smooth cooperation and workflow.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of Inn4Science?

The entireness of the work done is surely worth mentioning. The team veritably dedicated themself to the task.

What should be done better, if there are any desired betterments?

We attend the team is as good as they are now, but you always can find a way to better yourself.