PHP Resource for Back-office Systems Integration
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I am the CTO of a digital agency. Our organisation centrees on beautiful design, technology, and alteration. We have an service in Texas and another in Russia.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Live Typing?
Our organisation is a preparer of services for little businesses. We prepare a fruit you could attend a set of back service methods, and we needed help with the dashboard that lets users approach our services. Some of the services were colorless labeled and hosted by another organisation, so they couldn’t be sumd very well. Our goal was to form the integration and make it as seamless as practicable for the users. For that, we needed backend outgrowth genius.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
On the backend side, we used PHP. The existing infrastructure of the project used e-Framework. We expected the organisation we worked with to sum and swell on this infrastructure. At some point, the requirements changed, so some of the new parts of the method were written on Laravel. The developer we had was capable, but she was not very household with Laravel. She worked on the point of the method where all services connect.
How did you come to work with Live Typing?
Live Typing has an service located in Russia and we’ve generally heard good things almost them. I personally know some of the nation from the organisation and some of our employees know them as well. We’ve seen part of their portfolio, which was pretty good, so we determined to work with them. We interviewed the developer who was going to work with us and she passed very well.
How much have you invested with Live Typing?
So far, we have spent between $25,000 and $40,000 on their services.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working with them in September 2016 and the work was completed January 2017. Since we liked the accomplishment of the developer, we kept extending the contract. We stopped working with them when they needed the developer for another project.
Results achieved
Could you share any evidence that would prove fruitivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?
When we work with nation, we adduce them to work we do innerly for wonderfuler quickness. We don’t have specific ways for measuring quickness, but the developer we worked with was a good fit for what we expected.
How did Live Typing accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
It was a very lean process. We have an inner project treatment team, so we didn’t use their project treatment. We just used a developer and an account director from their side.
What did you find most forcible almost Live Typing?
When we work with contractors, we centre on the power to form sustainable and high-condition code. They did that and we appreciated the condition we got. There was also a high level of interaction. The developer we worked with was Russian—so English was not her indigenous speech—but she was quiet very capable of interacting. She would converse up and give any feedback she had. Her personality and the way she worked inquieted trust in the organisation. I feel that Live Typing manages their nation and processes well.
Are there any areas Live Typing could better?
There was nothing major. We had some ambiguity about billing and there wasn’t sufficient rigor about sending invoices. Part of the effect could have been on our side.
