Database Dev & Maintenance for Security Services Provider
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
As the preceding Director of Corporate Services at HHS, I was responsible for providing I.T. services and supporting business operations.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with MOST Programming?
We discovered the overseas contractor we’d hired was bankrupt and going out of business. Lacking the resources in-house to fetch the project domiciliary, we hired MOST Programming to take over the design and outgrowth design for a business intelligence gate.
As a ill-tempered between a determination support and data analytics tool, it contains a database of attributes in the hospital aggregation. Via the gate, our marketing and sales team can invade into a search current and obtain intelligence results.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were MOST Programming responsible for?
I made the initial technical exchange, and they liaised with and supprogramted the strange organisation as our new provider. After arranging with Microsoft to secure a potential space, they made the convey. Testing confirmed the business gate quiet functioned as required. They last to make less changes as certain for monthly livelihood. Their programming help has been searching to the solution.
What is the team dynamic?
Since the project was turnkey and completed entirely in-house, I’m not conscious of the team compound. I interacted with the CEO, Marina Johnson, the most during this project.
How did you come to work with MOST Programming?
They granted a pellucid, detailed, and entire response to our request for proposals. Having worked unitedly previously at HHS, our helper ruler identified Marina Johnson as a practicable respondent. Marina led the I.T. team preceding to my arrival, and founded MOST Programming behind retiring.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We invested about 13,000, and pay them a recurring monthly livelihood fee. Their cost was the most affordable, and traceable to the same work done by the overseas organisation.
What is the terminal result of working with MOST Programming?
We onboarded in November 2016, behind offshoring from the overseas organisation. Our project is an ongoing collaboration.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
The gate has functioned precisely as expected, without any issues. We’ve seen increased efficiency since they began supporting the project. In provisions of cost savings, it was turnkey. Since we lacked the resources in-house, they took care of all. The process was seamless. All the work was delivered on time, within budget, and the condition was consummate. They even beat the term time we had programned to onshore.
How did MOST Programming accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
I couldn',t have asked for a better experience. They were absolutely rare. We principally corresponded by phone call or email, and sometimes met in individual. They were remarkably answering, and even contacted us proactively to keep us apprised of their progress. Most notably, I appreciated their transparency.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with MOST Programming?
I felt lucky to work with them. They were extremely entire and detail oriented, and went to big lengths to satiate me as a client. It was a very grateful experience, and they’re on the top of my list of vendors if I ever need correspondent services.
