SaaS Software Dev for Hydroponics Company
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
Introductory information
A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities
I',m a CTO and co-founder of 3DPonics. I',ve been running this organisation for three years. We design CAD models of 3D printed components for creating manner on-demand hydroponics methods - ranging from little home-based installations to larger farms.
Desired goal
What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?
Opengenica?To create a method to handle hydroponics installations, assembled from the 3D components. That included watering, water condition control, temperature control, and many other things.
What were your objectives for this project?
We wanted a SaaS method that would form a new income current for our organisation and fetch new buyers for our 3D printed models and components.
Provided solution
What were the reasons for choosing Opengenica?
Another organisation wonderfully recommended them. We also researched online and named for references. We liked the iterative access, and ",lightweight", Scrum processes Opengenica recommended for our project.
Describe the project and the services they granted in detail.
The project had separate major components: Arduino-based sensors and actuators Arduino-based controlling software written in Python Backend for collecting information and providing C&,C using RESTful APIs and AWS DynamoDB for storage AWS Data Pipelines for data processing and aggregation Dashboard backend built with Django and Aurora DB Frontend built with React.js
Were there any dedicated handlers or teams that you worked with?
The team included an account executive, a project handler, four software developers, and one QA engineer. We were working mainly with the PM, with occasional help from the AE.
Results achieved
Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?
We successfully launched the beta rendering in February 2018, and then dropped ",beta", status in May.
How was project handlement arranged and how powerful was it?
We used JIRA for PM, Slack for synchronization, Google Drive for documents, and we had regularly scheduled status update calls. It worked pretty well, and Opengenica',s nation were very answering.
What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of Opengenica?
It',s how they were able to create a intricate method like this one end-to-end, without having to pull any additional / 3rd-party resources. It',s the expertise and experience they brought to the table, making it practicable to constructor and eventually to create what we wanted (and - most importantly - needed!)
What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?
It',s hard to tell. They were always super-proactive in collecting the feedback at all stages of the project and were fast to correct the processes if something was working less than consummate.