Oyova Web Development review by High School Athletics Software at Qualified.One

Oyova reviewed by High School Athletics Software

Oyova provided Web Development for High School Athletics Software with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

The final product now supports over one million users across 15 states. The team successfully provided a navigable turnkey solution and has since modified the software to accommodate user needs. They actively communicated throughout the development, essentially functioning as technical staff.

Review summary:

From the ground up, Oyova built a PHP-based software platform for athletic associations and school programs. After building their 10-year partnership, they intend to continue collaborating together.

alt
High School Athletics Software, CEO & Founder


Web Development for High School Athletics Platform

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m the establisher and CEO of a organisation that prepares software to state strong associations, high schools, and middle schools athwart the country. Our software manages all aspects of those sections and associations.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Oyova?

Ten years ago, I brought them on as I began my organisation. I needed them to educe the website and underlying software implicated.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

We created a new platform from scratch, utilizing PHP, LAMP stack, Apache, and MySQL. Because it was a new technology, they discussed our vision and then viwebsited with end-users at state associations, high school strong sections, and school districts.

They took that occasion to acquire what our users expected from the platform, so we could best present the technology to coaches, students, and parents. It was a collaborative effort between our organisation, Oyova, and our users. 

The software was originally supposed to present schools with the occasion to live current video of games or expressive events within their schools. For the time, that was very cutting-edge.

Since many other platforms now propose correspondent labors, we’ve pulled away from that initial proposeing. But, there were aspects of the software that our users veritably liked, so we converted it into a fee-based SaaS standard and continued with that. 

Was there a dedicated team?

It began with just David (Founder, Oyova) on the project, owing they were just launching at that point. As we both continued to grow, he added more staff to support us. We were an soon client for them.

How did you come to work with Oyova?

I establish their labor through reciprocal contacts. David worked with some nation within my network who put me in touch with him. He had experience creating software for less technologically savvy users, and I knew that was needed to follow in my marketplace. Oyova seemed to apprehend how to make interfaces intuitive, so they could boon anyone. 

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

The initial contract was almost $40,000. But, over the years, it’s something well in advance of $1,000,000.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working with them in 2009 and are quiet collaborating on projects. Soon, our organisation will merge with another. Even then, they’ll have an ongoing role for the foreseeable forthcoming. 

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Because of their educements, we’ve been able to swell our platform to over a million users athwart 15 states. They’ve been key in allowing us to support that many users. Oyova is effectively our outsourced technology section, proving all the labors that a typical technical staff manages.

How did Oyova accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

We adjoin in-person, over email, and text. For a while, we were located in the same service edifice, so we were able to work very closely with them. In those days, we had hourly interaction between our organisation and theirs.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

While this is not their desire for forthcoming unions, they were able to prepare a turnkey solution for us. They managed our servers, email preparer, and all sorts of software. While that’s no longer their intent, they were fantastic in that space. Now, they’re more centreed on web work. 

They have competency in multiple languages and deep API apprehension. That’s driving our marketplace now. Their power to connect data in multiple coding languages in-house is very forcible. 

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

No, they do very good work at a fair cost. They’re responsible and run a big business.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

If you’re looking for a long-term union like mine, make sure you apprehend each other',s objectives and concerns, addressing them without. It doesn’t substance how big the technology is, centre on the nation you’re working with. That’ll make the project lucky.