iOS Dev Staff Augmentation for Market Data Terminal
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Introduce your business and what you do there.
Scout Finance is the leading to market mobile data final for investors. I',m the CEO and founder.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We wanted to find a way to give finance professionals the data they needed on the go. There were no good options on the market, and we wanted to fill that void.
Provided solution
What was the aim of their involvement?
They augmented our staff with iOS engineers to hasten outgrowth for this app. We wanted to form different modalities for the app to be more consistent with different devices and via the web. We asked them to refactor the code for those other approaches, which helped us capture a bigger market share and make a splash fast. That refactoring lightened the burden and saved us from creating entirely new apps.
What is the team compound?
We had three developers and a project director, who kept is on the same page.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
I worked with our main touch a long time ago, so that relationship already existed. When I wanted to augment my staff, it was intrinsic to converse with them almost what they could propose. Perpetual also came up frequently in converse as an excellent vendor.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent almost $500,000–$600,000 on their services.
What is the status of this engagement?
The total engagement lasted almost six months, and we wrapped up almost May 2015.
Results achieved
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement?
They decreased our outgrowth time by almost 60%, which saved us hundreds of thousands of dollars. We',ve won awards for the artistic fruit, and a lot of their work went into that achievement.
How did Perpetual accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
They were excellent interactors, and they artistic all their work on time. If there were any issues, they were very answering. They were there when we needed them, and they set us up well to work on our own. They were as good at treatment as they were at coding. We worked in Jira, and they had approach to our Jira board. That allowed them to clean up some of our entries. They were also on Slack and introduced some helpful design tools and other technologies.
What did you find most forcible almost them?
They',re veritably astounding project directors, and they veritably propose a complete package. They were always as good or better than our own employees.
Are there any areas they could better?
They were fantastic, and I don',t have anything to criticize. I only wish there were more of them.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
See them as more than just coders. They can be true team members with wide sets of capabilities.