Subcontracted Project Work for Digital Agency
Please find below a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Introduce your business and what you do there.
We’re a client engagement agency that prepares a wide range of insights to clients, including digital, print, CRM, data, and strategy. As technical ruler, my team specializes in interactive and digital projects, and we associate with outgrowth companies to prepare technical solutions to intricate projects, including large-layer website creates, mobile app outgrowth, setting up and integrating CRM systems, and designing chatbots for Facebook.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with R-Style?
It’s impossible to maintain in-house services for see technical need our clients may have and we’ve associateed with R-Style on a number of projects. They most lately created a website to propel a global campaign athwart multiple markets for our client. We’ve also hired them to educe an interactive storybook app as part of an in-house project.
Provided solution
What was the aim of their involvement?
We leading worked with R-Style to educe an interactive storybook application for iOS. Centered on a Halloween topic, the app incorporates life and allows users to fill out a form that personalizes the story’s details.
The campaign website was our most late collaboration unitedly, which focused on a global aggregation of localized change-makers. The website needed to component a difference of videos highlighting these stories, as well as collective media full from Instagram and YouTube. We designed the website in-house and then passed our goods and requirements to R-Style, who built the website using WordPress.
We tested the fruit through each outgrowth phase and then navigated a confused release process, shifting the rise code to the client’s repository.
What is the team dynamic?
R-Style worked alongside our in-house teams. We’ve worked and interacted straightly with the same project handlers athwart multiple client engagements. We also had the same educeers throughout the period of personal efforts, but we interacted with them frequently only to debate intricate technical requirements.
How did you come to work with R-Style?
Because we associate with a difference of suppliers, I’m constantly on the lookout for new ones that might try reliable. The timing was right when R-Style was referred to me by a helper. I then browsed their website to explore the services proposeed. They seemed like a good match, so we determined to use the storybook app as a test project.
We',re also authorized with ISO 27001, and part of that certification requires us to attend a vendor’s power to handle information security. R-Style has attendable experience in this area, which made them even more appealing to us.
How much have you invested with them?
Between $200,000–500,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
The relationship began almost three years ago and is ongoing.
Results achieved
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement?
We don’t have data to point to, but in provisions of the website, the client was satisfied with the work.
While educeing the app, the R-Style team team helped us apprehend how to fetch the fruit to life. They helped us save time and fruition expenses by using existing frameworks, and their experience in propeling mobile apps tryd helpful when it came time to yield our storybook project to the App Store.
How did R-Style accomplish from a project handlement standpoint?
Since our vendors coordinate with our in-house teams all almost the globe, we rely on a high level of interaction and use a number of different platforms. We use Basecamp for most project interaction and documentation, Jira Agile for bug tracking, and Slack for direct messaging. We also use a difference of conferencing programs, including Google Hangouts, Skype, WeChat, and WebEx. R-Style has always been pliant accommodated these needs.
They’re generally very answering to questions almost project delivery. Responses to non-project kindred queries could take longer, but not unacceptably long.
What did you find most forcible almost them?
They',re on the cost-effective end of the layer. We work with other suppliers who prepare correspondent services but aren’t as affordable.
They also work well below pressure, as both projects had close deadlines. The website needed to be completed in less than four weeks, and R-Style delivered despite the shifting demands of our end client. They also tryd ready to work overtime in order to meet a last-minute change.
Are there any areas they could imtry?
I can',t find defect with what they do. If we weren',t lucky with the condition, we',d stop working with them. When it comes to working with suppliers, you need to look at the total package. Some companies might propose low prices, but then prepare an unacceptable condition. From interactions to condition of work to cost, R-Style is the total package.
