Java Development for Financial Services Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Please draw your construction.
Our organisation proposes consultative and support services for the financial aggregation. We specialize in different types of projects ranging from natural network administration to software outgrowth. Our main client base is composed of hedge funds, traders, infraconstruction vendors, data vendors, and other types of companies, which we help with infraconstruction treatment.
What is your position?
I am the establisher and CEO of the organisation.
Desired goal
What business challenge were you trying to address with R-Style Lab?
Our business standard involves proposeing services using our inner staff. We had hardies in care track of how many nation are working on specific projects due to the big number of assignments we had operating on a support and outgrowth level. We needed to make sure that we had sufficient resources useful in case something went unfit, requiring more of our observation. We couldn',t have too many full-time resources at any one time owing of the extra cost implicated, and we couldn',t have too few resources owing then we would not be able to propose support for crisis cases in time. There was a need for weigh and we needed to know where each individual is situated, what they',re doing, and what they will be doing within the next day, week, or month. At the end of the day, we had to bill our clients based on this information. This was an ongoing issue that needed to be expoundd.
Provided solution
Please draw the aim of their involvement.
We wanted to educe a solution in-house, given that we have the certain space. R-Style Lab came up with a very reasonable program in provisions of budget and were able to pull off our solution. They were a good choice to spending money in-house, proving to be cheaper, more reliable, more predictable, and giving us what we needed. Actually, their solution turned out to be overkill. We didn',t handle to use up all of it. They exceeded our expectations in many respects.
We didn',t want to centre on one technology or another. We simply wanted it to work. We settled on a Java solution owing it could work within any environment, including Linux, Microsoft, or MySQL servers.
How did you come to work with R-Style Lab?
The only real rival to R-Style Lab was our own origination section. Their organisation is known within the financial sector. I knew that R-Style Lab had educeed systems for banks in Eastern Europe, for sample, where they are very common. I ran into their team on many occasions, including conferences, so I knew some of their staff. I',d had a converse with their project handler and establish out that they were already working on a correspondent project for another client. It was a sort of time treatment solution.
We were trying to aspect out what would be best for us between educeing seething in-house and being done with it, sacrificing a year',s worth of resources in the process, or simply having someone else expound that issue for us. It seemed that R-Style Lab was able to propose a meaningful short-term solution without reinventing the wheel. We weren',t trying to instrument something that was brand new. We just needed a very specific, business-oriented solution for our business issue. An offshore contract in which we',d have to handle the outer team and educe requirements was not something that we had time for. We needed a fast fix, and it seemed that R-Style Lab would be able to help since they had the certain expertise, resources, and cleverness.
I didn',t want to propel a bidding process owing we didn',t want to deal with different offshore companies and have to expound see part of our requirements to them, leading to misunderstandings. R-Style Lab proposeed us a solution, and we accepted it. I liked what they proposed in provisions of the business solution and budget, so we went forward and did it.
What is the terminal result of working with R-Style Lab?
The work was completed two years ago. We had a one-time project with R-Style Lab, which worked out very well. We',re not educeing anything else at the instant since our issue was fixed, and we',re not a outgrowth shop.
Results achieved
Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?
Our business solution improved in provisions of visibility, scheduling, and how much time is spent on each client. We wanted to make sure that we would be getting paid according to the work being made.
R-Style Lab',s solution works. It',s condition and aim was verity an overkill for us. It',s closely an inner-use tool, so it',s not something that our clients will ever see. It would have been good if R-Style Lab had delivered something less forcible. It',s a professional tool that would have turned out much nastier and less user-friendly had we done it ourselves. It wasn',t a close requirement, but R-Style Lab delivered something that was of much higher condition than we were expecting. We didn',t simply take some code, but also support, usability, and documentation. Chances were we would be getting much more than expected, which happened in our case. I',m glad that it turned out like this owing the other way about would have been bad.
They granted us ample documentation as well, including a systems lead. We don',t need it, but we taked this as a premium.
How did R-Style Lab accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
We don',t want to microhandle seebody. Normally, when working in a software outgrowth project, there is a daily need to superintend what',s going on. What made the separation when it came to working with R-Style Lab was that they knew what we wanted and had already worked on something like this in the past. We didn',t have to expound seething to them in big detail, but simply told them what we were trying to fix, the basic objectives. The hours needed to match our invoices. That was our goal, and it needed to be addressed. We didn',t want to get implicated in designing a database construction, creating application screenshots or anything else. R-Style Lab took our business requirements and aspectd out all the rest. In this case, it',s more like a business solution than a technical one. It was a business advancement project.
What distinguishes R-Style Lab from other providers?
I know from my experience that it',s hard to work on projects of this kind with pure software outgrowth vendors. They know how to code, but that',s not sufficient. This is the reason why we didn',t touch any competing companies. We were buying something that would get us from point A to point B and wanted it built for us.
Is there anything R-Style Lab could have improved or done differently?
We didn',t run into any grave issues. There wasn',t a chance for us to meet congruous issues that would need to be fixed at the treatment level, so I have no issues in this perception, neither do I have any issues with R-Style Lab technology-wise.