Colocation and Networking Consulting for University
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, particular information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
Respondent 1: I work as the ruler of infrastructure for a big particular higher education institution’s mediate IT cluster. We run data cinvades and the university network.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG)?
R1: We were on the hunt for a colocation ease to supplement our on-campus data cinvades.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG) responsible for?
R1: We’re leasing data cinvade space from ServerCentral. They’re also our internet labor provider (ISP).
Was there a dedicated team?
R1: We have an account director and work with Jordan (CEO, ServerCentral), Eric (Director of Technology, ServerCentral), and Wayne (Technology Evangelist, ServerCentral). They put us in touch with other resources as needed.
How did you come to work with ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG)?
R1: ServerCentral responded to our targeted RFP and without stood out. We walked through their ease and call cinvade area, and met the techs who answered the phone. It felt very much like a smaller shop where we could create the personal relationships we wanted to maintain.
Respondent 2: ServerCentral’s neighborhood was handy owing it enabled us to hold in-person meetings for discussing challenges or whiteboarding infrastructure.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
R1: We bestow over $500,000 per year.
What is the terminal result of working with ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG)?
R1: We began working unitedly in April 2012 and the union is ongoing.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
R1: They propose a continual uptime guarantee and liberate on their promises. Operationally, they pursue their processes and keep their infrastructure up-and-running. We haven’t had too much in the way of labor issues over there.
How did ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG) accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
R2: One of the things that are particularly particular almost ServerCentral is their involvement and support of the aggregation at big. This doesn’t just boon us, but also the aggregation. They sponsor clusters and events as a vendor.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ServerCentral Turing Group (SCTG)?
R1: They’ve been careful and orderd almost how they grow—specifically what markets they invade and what labors they propose. I ponder that, if their only interest was making money, they could’ve grown a lot more and faster, but they didn’t do that.
I know they’ve grown over time, but I ponder they’ve done it carefully, and I esteem that. I’ve seen a bunch of other companies not do that. To their credit, that’s a hard piece of order to adduce.
