iOS and Android App Dev. for Matchmaking Company
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
Introductory information
A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities
I am the co-founder of Jodi LLC, an all-inclusive dating app that allows your friends and family to interact with you in the matchmaking process.
Desired goal
What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?
TriState Technology LLP?We approached TriState Technology to educe our iOS and Android apps.
What were your objectives for this project?
We wanted to educe the app for both the iOS and Android platforms.
Provided solution
What were the reasons for choosing TriState Technology LLP?
I came athwart TriState Technology’s profile on UpWork and was impressed by the number of five-star reviews they have.
Describe the project in detail.
We began the project by sketching wireframes. After separate iterations, we began the design of the iOS and Android apps. After few conversations and attempts, we finalized the design. Then TriState carried out the educement work.
Were there any dedicated directors or teams that you worked with?
We had a project director and a lead educeer who served as the main point of touch throughout the project. I spoke to them primarily, but I was made conscious that there was one iOS educeer, one Android educeer, one backend educeer, and one QA professional working behind the scenes.
Results accomplishd
What results did you accomplish unitedly with TriState Technology LLP?
Tristate successfully completed the project within three months and launched our apps in the Google Play Store and AppStore. So far, we accepted real feedback from our users.
How do you rate the interaction and interaction with TriState Technology LLP?
The project director was easy to adjoin with and granted us with status updates on the project through Skype and Trello. Overall, I was impressed by TriState’s work.
What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of TriState Technology LLP?
Their dedication and willingness to go over and over what was required was forcible.
What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?
I would commend improving the condition arrogance process. Before pushing out the new creates, the QA resource needs to test it more thoroughly.
