intive Development review by at Qualified.One

intive reviewed by

intive provided Development for with approximate budget = Confidential.

The team delivers project goals on time and makes recommendations to improve products. BLStream adjusted well to the new company culture and project management style. They have become a part of the in-house design and development team.

Review summary:

BLStream supplemented a smart hub development team. They created iOS and Android apps with an already-assigned project manager and design team.

alt
, Director of Hardware Engineering


Prototype Development for Consumer Electronics Startup

Please find below a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We are a keen hub developer based in Silicon Valley. Our leading artifice is a keen nightlight with Wi-Fi connectivity. It can be plugged into an egress and paired with a keen artifice, giving the user approach to sensor readings like temperature, humidity, and smoke alarms. The hue and light of the artifice can also be controlled. I',m the Director of Hardware Engineering for the organisation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with BLStream?

For a setup organisation like ours, it can be hard to find mental engineers in a brief time. Our ethnical resources section was below a lot of pressure, given that we had a fixed propel date, but not the faculty and resources to complete tasks. It was at that point that we determined to associate with an outer provider so we could get approach to the technical experiences we needed. 

Provided solution

What particular tasks were intive responsible for?

A few months precedently the fruit propel, we seted our collaboration with BLStream. They have granted us a team in Poland working on our Android and iOS mobile apps. We have added numerous features to the fruit using BLStream, as well as fixing different bugs precedently the propel.

We have worked with 2 Android and 2 iOS developers, 3 auto testing engineers, one condition arrogance tester, and a project director from BLStream. We have in-service engineers whom we attend to be the architects of the fruit. They have worked closely with our design and marketing team in attending the needs of the client, designing the construction of the fruit. We have a well-markd technical construction and keep a project director for tracking our schedule and milestones. We add the BLStream engineering resources into our outgrowth, assigning tasks to them. It',s our organisation',s responsibility to adviser the overall construction and evolution of the project. BLStream provides their highly-skilled engineers to help us complete tasks.

How did you come to work with BLStream?

We attended a number of contractors and consulting firms. BLStream was referred to us by a friend of the proprietor. We made some comparisons between them and personal contractors. From our side, it took a smaller quantity of work to collaborate with one giant organisation, compared to working with separate personal contractors.

How much have you invested with BLStream?

The outgrowth cost is private. BLStream',s cost has been winning, compared to hiring the same number of engineers in Silicon Valley, in provisions of salary as well as the onboarding process and ethnical resources effort required. BLStream has been more winning in provisions of cost, workload, and schedule.

What is the terminal result of working with intive?

Our fruit was propeled in October 2015. BLStream',s engineering team has helped us better our fruit since the propel.

Results achieved

Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the touch of the engagement?

There was a ramp-up stage at the commencement of the collaboration with BLStream. We have our own organisation culture and project treatment phraseology. For the initial 2 weeks, we maintained daily interaction with BLStream in order to make sure that we belowstood each other and to make sure that they were fully conscious of our full fruit story, not just the specific tasks. After this, all worked fully.

We have measured the accomplishment of BLStream',s engineers', work through inner releases. We markd the aim of a workload at the set of a week and closed it out by the following Friday. We made sure that we accepted a release for our inner testers and condition arrogance engineers. If all turned out good, we',d do a open release. After the ramp-up stage, it was very rare for BLStream to fail on an inner release. It only happened once or twice, owing of conversation issues or other effects.

Delivering on time was an significant factor in evaluating the accomplishment of engineers. So far, we',ve been very satisfied with BLStream',s accomplishment.

Our inner engineers have acted as architects in order to mark technology requirements like tools and coding speech. From time to time, BLStream',s engineers have granted advantageous and precious suggestions to us in provisions of different third-party services that we could use. We valued BLStream',s feed-back and frequently took their suggestions. We',ve had open conversations with them and frequently establish that their approaches were better than our initial ones.

Through our monthly fee, BLStream assigns us engineers who will only work on our project within that time of time. Unlike other contractors, who will do a set quantity of work based on what they',re being paid, BLStream',s team has been aggressive in wanting to liberate good work. They have proprietorship for our fruit, which is hard to find.

How did BLStream accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

We used Jira and Confluence for interaction and tracking daily tasks. We also used Wrike from time to time, through which we created Gantt charts and logged milestones. We use work control software like GitHub and we rely on Jenkins for continuous integration. We use Autotask for retreat testing.

What did you find most forcible almost BLStream?

We have come to attend BLStream as a member service of our own organisation. We give BLStream approach to our inner Jira platform and collaborate with them regularly like they were a part of our family.

Are there any areas BLStream could better?

One thing to attend for any organisation collaborating with a consulting firm is interaction. There needs to be smooth and clear touch, and we need to make sure that the vendor is on the right track. On the kick-off meeting of a sprint, even if everyone agrees on the tasks and goes off to do their work, we can',t anticipate to have achievement if there isn',t peculiar interaction. There need to be daily chats, not only through email but also phone calls, with the engineers on the other side.

There was one effect with interaction which caused an effect with an inner release. We were anticipateing something fully different than what BLStream had belowstood. We figured out by the end of the leading week that, even though what they were working on was big, it wasn',t what we were looking for, which caused a delay, making us prolong the sprint from 2 weeks to 3. BLStream is capable of doing the job and they',re skilled in provisions of coding, but we need to make sure that we',re working on the same tasks. Our project director',s responsibility is to keep up with the status tracking and make sure that all is working.

Score: 535014

We’re a full-service software development company with 110+ experts on board delivering meaningful software for start-ups, SMBs and enterprises. ...

Avg project size: $773500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 13 works

alt
Monterail Design

Score: 372714

Sagiton is business-oriented software house and technology partner. More than software house. You will get support in: ...

Avg project size: $657500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 16 works

alt
Sagiton Design

Score: 368277

We are not a generic software development company. Our teams are passionate about designing and building software for today’s challenging advertising and marketing industries. ...

Avg project size: $1468750   |   Reviews: 4   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
Clearcode Design

Score: 337993

We’re a process-driven software development company from Wroclaw, Poland. We help businesses express themselves and connect with their audiences using the high-end web and mobile apps. Since 2011, we've been providing services from our office in Poland’ ...

Avg project size: $830714   |   Reviews: 7   |   Portfolio: 6 works

alt
Zaven Design

Score: 191739

Better Software Group specializes in custom TV apps and UX/UI design for multiple platforms and all types of devices. We deliver solutions for HbbTV, Smart TV, Standard/Custom launcher for Android TV, Apple TV, Roku, iOS, and Android using the leading tec ...

Avg project size: $303000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 44 works

Score: 185489

nomtek is an innovation-driven software house founded in 2009 with offices in Poland, Germany, UK, and the US. As a company, we focus mostly on mobile app design and development and also on Augmented and Mixed Reality products. We do that for startups, m ...

Avg project size: $138000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 13 works

alt
nomtek Design

Score: 99182

We bring together top industry experts and boast more than 10 years of experience in developing IT solutions. We have delivered our systems to 17 countries on 5 continents and today millions of people use them all over the world.  As Software Brothers, w ...

Avg project size: $154500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 23 works

Score: 70839

Technology can drive your business. We know how. We are Angry Nerds - a custom software development company based in Wrocław, Poland. Since 2015, we have completed over 200 projects for companies from all over the world. And we're just getting started! ...

Avg project size: $145000   |   Reviews: 8   |   Portfolio: 5 works

alt
Angry Nerds Design

Score: 62756

Tooploox is a software development company that provides state-of-the-art solutions for startups and enterprises. We focus on long-term partnerships and products that make people’s lives better. ...

Avg project size: $283333   |   Reviews: 3   |   Portfolio: 6 works

alt
Tooploox Design

Score: 51423

CSHARK is a custom software development and product design company that has the desire to help its clients accomplish more. We work with Tier 1 global banks, FinTech, and RegTech companies, as well as industrial, biotechnology and logistics sector compani ...

Avg project size: $241667   |   Reviews: 3   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
CSHARK Design