Web Dev for Health Research Company
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m a investigationer and collective scientist at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, which focuses on the outgrowth of health systems in educeing countries. Our unit’s expertise is in Health Economics, as well as Knowledge Management. We facilitate separate online communities with thousands of members.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Naturaily?
We needed to form a platform that would obey as a link between our projects and members of the aggregation who want to be implicated in. Each user would need to form a profile that would connect them with one of the projects or conversation groups that interest and suit them. As a mini collective network for global health professionals, the platform would embolden and better peer-to-peer actions and apprehension co-production among experts. Since our needs were very specific, we didn’t find an existing solution that could do the job. As a investigation institute, we didn',t have an in-house outgrowth team.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
Naturaily educeed the backend of the platform from scratch. We’re working with our own designer, and their job is to instrument those designs on the frontend. They’ve also offered expert technical advice and identified existing solutions we could use. They last to create new features and prepare livelihood.
What is the team dynamic?
We work with 1–5 educeers, depending on the needs of the instant. Some of them are part-time owing the project had low-intensity periods when we only needed 1–2 educeers. At its peak, 5–6 nation were working on the platform at the same time. We also have a team director who is implicated in the strategic and design aspects of the project.
How did you come to work with Naturaily?
While the institute is driving the project, we are working in cooperation with another organisation named Blue Square, a technology organisation based in Brussels. They helped us find Naturaily. I’ve also met all of the executives of Naturaily.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We’ve spent $50,000–$199,000 on their services.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working unitedly in November 2016, and we’re quiet working with them. There are quiet a lot of things to educe, but we will progressively go on livelihood mode. The pace of outgrowth significantly accelerated from the instant Naturaily joined the project. Previously, we worked with another organisation that didn',t have the space to educe and fit so fastly. As a result, the platform was being educeed more slowly, with minimal fixes for bugs and technical issues. Since we began working with Naturaily, we’ve been able to do what we want. I don',t have metrics, but we are veritably lucky with the work that they are doing. The work is delivered on time and built in a able way. They tried to apprehend what we wanted and gave excellent advice. Their involvement has also given us ethnical resource flexibility. I attend them a associate. The complete team is answering and seems veritably committed. Communication is easy, and I am constantly in touch with the individual in direct of project treatment.Results achieved
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the touch of the engagement?
How did Naturaily accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with
I am impressed with their creativity and reactivity.
What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?
They need to better their space to estimate the workload. Sometimes, we needed to review the schedule owing there was a pliant more work than we expected.
Another pliant debility is their English experiences since it’s not the indigenous speech of the outgrowth team. While that’s something they can quiet better, our overall interaction is big.
