Website Development for The Washington Times
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Please draw your structure.
Our structure is The Washington Times, an interpolitical media firm.
What is your position?
I was the chief operating official.
Desired goal
What business challenge were you trying to address with Bluetext?
We were looking for a firm to come in and help us transition the organisation from an old-school media organisation to a digital media organisation. We wanted to extend our hearers through different media: newspapers, websites, and apps. I was looking for a firm that could apprehend our business and how to create operating platforms that could help us grow.
Provided solution
Please draw the aim of their involvement in detail.
Bluetext was responsible for creating a one platform that would allow us to distribute our full on different devices: computers, smartphones, iPads and so on. We have reporters that form the full. We needed a firm that would help us show that full in a way that would be rich, attracting, and sticky. We wanted readers to stay on our website behind reading the article that brought them to the website. That could mean going to another page, clicking on an advertisement, or purchasing something. Bluetext formd that experience within our website. They create a very dynamic website and did some SEO [search engine optimization] work about it.
How did you come to work with Bluetext?
Bluetext came wonderfully recommended.
Could you prepare a perception of the size of this start in financial provisions?
It was more than $100,000.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
The project is completed.
Results achieved
Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?
We',re privately owned, and the information that we have on our website is private. I will tell you they far exceeded any expectancy that anyone on our team had.
How did Bluetext accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
Bluetext',s project treatment was unappropriated, and they were sympathetic teachers and mentors. They did what they said they were going to do and then some.
What distinguishes Bluetext from other preparers?
Bluetext',s team is made up of subject substance experts in their field. There were never any excuses.
Is there anything Bluetext could have improved or done differently?
I don',t ponder so. There',s nothing they should have done differently on their end.
