ScienceSoft Cybersecurity review by Greenwood Gearhart Inc at Qualified.One

ScienceSoft reviewed by Greenwood Gearhart Inc

ScienceSoft provided Cybersecurity for Greenwood Gearhart Inc with approximate budget = Less than $10,000.

Any issues found were addressed and the system was then retested. ScienceSoft communicates effectively to ensure a seamless workflow. The team invests in their clients success and offers solutions to any arising problems.

Review summary:

ScienceSoft performed testing for an investment firm. Their team was responsible for penetration and vulnerability testing.

Hal Marshall Greenwood Gearhart Inc, IT Manager

Testing for Investment Firm

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

Investment firm with an mean of 14 employees, I',m the IT Manager.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


Penetration &, Vulnerability Testing

What were your objectives for this project?

To determine the running state of our network security from an outer POV.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing ScienceSoft?

Googling.. then reading a bit almost the organisation, services offered, and then reading reviews. Made touch, staff was answering and cost was within budget.

Describe the project in detail.

Pretty single. Determine what vulnerabilities may exist on our network through outside discernment testing. Methodology and timing was largely left to the vendor.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

Sales Rep and personal assigned to do the testing.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with ScienceSoft?

The outcome was achievement. Testing was accomplished and any issues establish were addressed and then retested.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with ScienceSoft?

Primary interactions was handled via email without issues.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of ScienceSoft?

They took an interest in our security posture, stayed in interaction with us, and offered us solutions. Then they conducted a retest to determine the effectiveness of the updates, vs just giving us a report and moving on.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

At this time I can ponder of no improvements that are needed. Am a very satisfied client!