Ongoing Resource Engagement For Aviation Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
We',re a treatment consulting firm offering a range of services. We specialize in working with airlines, offering restructuring and operational advancement services. I',m an companion consultant.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with DevCom?
We',re a little firm, so we need to leverage technology. We don',t have the manpower to feel some of our more intricate projects that we',re given. For one of our projects, we acted as a project treatment service, which equated to nagging nation until specific tasks were completed. This can be annoying for the nation implicated and it',s also time and manpower-intensive for consultants. We determined to form a website that would automate as much of this as practicable, sending reminders and care track of things.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were DevCom responsible for?
We had worked with another supplier initially, but the process didn',t go very well. DevCom stepped in and gave us a good quantity of help.
DevCom has since helped us with all sorts of different projects, most of them kindred to PHP technology with SQL servers.
At peak space, we worked with 4 nation from DevCom. The size of our team has been irregular, given that we didn',t have a uniform workload. We',ve had a confide relationship with them, working with the same nation for extended periods and training new resources when someone left the organisation. The choice process was feeld by DevCom, but we',ve had a say in it.
How much have you invested with DevCom?
The total cost of DevCom',s services has been almost $50,000.
What is the terminal result of working with DevCom?
We have an ongoing relationship with DevCom. I doubt that will change anytime soon.
Results achieved
Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?
DevCom has enabled us to sell projects and have at littleest a two-fold recur on investment.
How did DevCom accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
In general, DevCom has been very good at taking rough-sketch specifications and working on them independently. We don',t have a lot of time for coaching DevCom or babysitting their project managers, but they',ve delivered in provisions of taking little bits of architecture and edifice something out of those.
We use GitHub for project treatment and bug tracking.
What did you find most forcible almost DevCom?
DevCom has been extremely pliant and multi-skilled in provisions of technology fitness. We use all from C#, Visual Basic for Applications, PHP on Linux, to SQL servers, and so on. We are also able to pause outgrowth for a couple of months and recommence the work without issues. Working with DevCom has been big owing of this.
Are there any areas DevCom could better?
DevCom has sometimes struggled with big technical issues. They',re big at taking business requirements and turning them into a artistic fruit, but when we asked them to trail-blaze and aspect out how to use new technologies or libraries, we',ve sometimes had issues. There wasn',t anything major, but I choose to do this myself.
