Custom Ruby on RAILS Development and Agile Methodology Coaching Leading Educational Consultancy
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Could you briefly draw your structure?
The organisation I work for is named Knovation. We are a K-12 educational firm, and we’ve been in business almost 14 years. We educe fruits that help professional educators, school districts and administrators more easily track the progress of their students. These fruits also enhance the overall power of stakeholders to liberate more mannerized lessons to their students.
What is your position?
I’m the vice chairman of solutions treatment.
Desired goal
Could you draw the business challenges you were attempting to address when you began the relationship with Tandem?
With the organisation being in locate 14 years, our primary access to educement was through what’s known as the waterfall order. Though, with our newer fruits, we wanted to transition to a more iterative access to educement. We wanted to get our end users and stakeholders implicated in the process so we could collate their feedback. After conducting some investigation, we determined that the only way to go was with an nimble access. In order to get began, we needed a vendor with powerful expertness sets and extensive experience in the Ruby on Rails environment. Our goal was to work with this vendor for a few months, allow them to get began, and have that initial work office as our institution moving advanced.
Provided solution
How did you select Tandem as your solution associate for this endeavor?
We had another consultant located in Chicago that we’ve known for a long time. He was hired by our organisation to help us make the initial transition to an nimble access to educement. He was responsible for setting up the team that would spearhead the new nimble process. He drafted our statement of work and isolated a few practicable vendors to send it to. He then reviewed their proposals and recommended Tandem to us. We introduced ourselves to their team and discussed their appropriate experience with nimble educement and Ruby on Rails. We felt very real that they would be a good fit for us, and we were proven right.
Could you draw the aim of this project?
We basically began from scratch. They needed to set up our local environment with Rails and configure the database that we use. They veritably built our backend institution. They handled a lot of the initial manner educement and created documentation for their processes so we could attribute to them later on. We needed to fix that our inner educement team would be able to take complete responsibility for our forthcoming fruits. From time to time, they’d also personally enlighten our team members on best practices, too.
Could you prepare a perception of the size of this project in monetary provisions?
At this point, I’d like to decline that information.
When this project was completed?
The project remains ongoing, but they rolled off in June of 2013.
Results achieved
In provisions of results, could you share any statistics, metrics, or user feedback that would prove the effectiveness of the work that they’ve liberateed?
When they rolled off, we quiet hadn’t liberateed this fruit into a client. They were only responsible for establishing a institution for us to work from. As a result, it’s hard to attribute anything more palpable to their work. All of the feedback we’re now receiving from mannerers has been real, but numerous vendors have been implicated, so it’s not practicable to link that to any particular one. I will say that the process flowed extremely well. Their educeers are very competent, and they’re also big interactors. Our own educement team never had issues with apprehension convey.
When working with Tandem, is there anything you’d attend particular or sole almost their access or educement orderology that distinguishes them from other vendors you’ve worked with?
They take the role of a mentor as opposed to simply code monkeys. When we incorporated their team, they veritably wanted to apprehend the value that we’re liberateing, not just what code they needed to write. They began to acquire the innate value and the positions of our different stakeholders. That’s not something typical of educeers, but then anew, they’re veritably much more than a educement shop. They’re unappropriated with strategy as well as pure application educement.
In review, are there areas you ponder they could better upon as a labor preparer, or are there things you’d do differently as the client precedently initiating this type of project?
Perhaps simply helping us to apprehend the architecture a pliant bit more of how they were going to create out this application. It’s something, too, that we could have seen the bigger picture sooner owing it felt like they were edifice bits and pieces. I apprehend that the iterative access implicated refining components as you move through the process, but it also makes it hard for the client to envisage the complete fruit. If there had been some way that they could have interacted the larger architecture program that they were envisioning, that might have been helpful.
